Last updated: April 06, 2026

← MSBAi Home

MSBAi Capstone/Practicum

Program-level details: See program/curriculum.md

Status: Draft Structure outlined (portfolio + applied project); pending detailed design with Vanitha. Part sequencing (portfolio-first vs project-first) is TBD — Vanitha to decide.
Credits: 4 Term: Fall 2027, Weeks 9-16 Instructor: Vanitha

Learning Outcomes (L-C-E Framework)

Literacy:

Competency:

Expertise:

Technology Stack


Overview

The capstone is the culminating experience of the MSBAi program. Students demonstrate both cumulative mastery and the ability to produce new independent work. The program concludes with a two-part capstone in the final semester. Students apply their analytics and AI skills to a comprehensive project and curate a professional portfolio highlighting their strongest work from across the program, preparing them to effectively communicate insights to employers.

Note: The order of the two parts below (Portfolio → Applied Project) reflects the current working design, but final sequencing is pending Vanitha’s decision. Do not communicate a specific order in external-facing materials until confirmed.

Faculty have discretion over project format, team structure, and assessment weight allocation within the ranges and guidelines below.


Part 1: Professional Portfolio (Weeks 1-4, Individual)

Students select and polish their 4 strongest projects from the 8 prior courses, transforming coursework into career-ready artifacts. Because each course requires project completion throughout the program, this phase focuses on refinement and presentation — not starting from scratch.

Requirement: 4 polished projects. Each must demonstrate skills from a different course.

Portfolio Checklist (suggested standards — faculty may adapt)

For each of the 4 projects, students should:

Career Transition Deliverables

Portfolio Presentation


Part 2: Applied Project (Weeks 5-8)

Students complete a new analytical project that integrates skills from across the program. Faculty decide the project format based on available partnerships, cohort size, and learning objectives.

Project Format (faculty decides)

Option Description
Client project Real engagement via Research Park partnership or corporate sponsor
Independent research Faculty-approved business problem with real-world data
Team or individual Faculty determines structure based on cohort and project type

If team-based, standard team size is 3 students (2 or 4 in exceptional circumstances). Faculty may use rotating project leads, peer evaluation, or other team accountability mechanisms at their discretion.

Competency Requirement

Every capstone project must demonstrate integration of skills from at least 3 of the 6 core competency areas:

Competency Area Source Course Example Skills
Data Management & Engineering BADM 554 SQL, Python, ETL pipelines, data quality
Data Communication & Visualization BDI 513 Storytelling, dashboards, Power BI, narrative
Predictive Modeling (ML I) FIN 550 Regression, classification, feature engineering
Big Data Infrastructure BADM 558 Cloud (AWS), Spark, dbt, data pipelines at scale
Business Intelligence BADM 557 BI, case analysis, AI-augmented business decisions
Advanced ML & Data Science (ML II) BADM 576 Ensembles, NLP, time series, MLOps/LLMOps

Students identify which competency areas their project addresses in a brief Competency Mapping section of their final deliverable.

Expected Deliverables

Faculty determine exact deliverable requirements. The following are recommended:

Confidentiality

For client projects involving proprietary data or NDAs:


Assessment Guidelines

Faculty allocate weights within these suggested ranges. The goal is flexibility while ensuring the capstone assesses both cumulative learning (portfolio) and new work (project).

AI Usage Levels (AIAS)

Assessment AIAS Level AI Permitted
Portfolio curation (Part 1) 3 AI as collaborator for polishing projects, career narrative, portfolio pitch — with full disclosure
Applied Project (Part 2) 3 AI as collaborator throughout — code generation, analysis, documentation — with full disclosure
Oral Defense 0 No AI
Process & Peer Evaluation 1 AI for reflection drafting only

Suggested Weight Ranges

Component Suggested Range Format
Portfolio (Part 1) 25-35% Individual
Applied Project deliverables (Part 2) 25-35% Faculty’s choice
Oral Defense 25-35% Individual accountability required
Process & Peer Evaluation 5-15% See notes below

Guardrails:

Oral Defense

The oral defense verifies individual understanding and develops professional presentation skills.

Recommended format:

Suggested assessment dimensions (from program oral defense rubric):

Faculty are encouraged to include process documentation as a graded component:

Peer Evaluation (if team-based)

When projects are team-based, faculty should include peer evaluation:


Suggested Timeline

Faculty adapt this timeline to their course structure:

Week Milestone
1 Portfolio kickoff: select 4 projects, begin polishing
2 Portfolio workshop: peer feedback on READMEs and reflections
3 Portfolio refinement + pitch practice
4 Portfolio pitch delivery + submission
5 Applied project kickoff: scope, form teams (if applicable), data access
6 Analysis and development
7 Draft deliverables + dry run presentation
8 Final submission + oral defense

Key Constraints


Career Transition Integration

The capstone is the critical “bridge to employment” for career pivoters. Beyond technical deliverables:


Course Sequence:BADM 576 — Data Science and Analytics (final course)